I have collected a wide variety of feedback for my product from members from our target audience as well as other audience demographics though our blog and via YouTube. I also have collected feedback from focus groups and selective screenings, which enables us to gather instant feedback. I believe that some of this feedback relates to our own view of our strengths and weaknesses as well as showing us what could be improved. This feedback can also be used to demonstrate Hall’s concepts of preferred, negotiated and oppositional readings.
From our feedback I can identify what the audience enjoyed watching and what made the video successful. Many people liked the song and believed the bikes worked well with the song, band and the concept of the quirky video. The audience feedback tells me that they enjoyed the different settings of the video, which ranged from a studio performance to cycling down a countryside lane to the performance under the tree outside. This made the video more entertaining and less tedious to watch unlike stereotypical studio performances. The different settings in the video enable the product to be watched over a few times as there’s always something different to see each time and is an enjoyable and pleasurable experience and often brings a very positive vibe to the audience. In combination with this it helps to increase the bands awareness. The audience also enjoys the uniqueness of the video and the risks taken to make it a video that stands out is a bit ‘different’ from the others. As I can see the risk we did take definitely paid off and made it a unique selling point. It helps differentiate it from other videos and due to the realism of it, makes you think it’s a very realistic band and scenario. The target audience are of this kind; individual, quirky, alternative that will enjoy this video, which demonstrates a sense of rareness and uniqueness compared to the usual stereotypical pop video. The focus groups particularly enjoyed the lanterns and the lighting of the video. They believed the bicycle wheel in the dark with the LED lights look very effective and there was a lot watch, which kept them occupied. They thought the band was very idealistic and appeal to the audience well and suit the genre well. They thought the whole set was very imaginative and different to other videos which again gave our video a unique selling point. They also were able to understand the narrative of the video, which we thought they wouldn’t, this meant the video would be more meaningful and effective. People believed there wasn’t a very strong storyline however; they liked the concept of the bikes as it added to that young fun feel of the band. They also enjoyed the end of the video where they were cycling back, however they had difficulty establishing if they were cycling back from the festival or it was a flash back. The image of the band where also represented well as the focus group were able to distinguish their style and what they symbolised. They believed they symbolised positivity and it was a ‘feel good’ video. The audience had a mixed view of the end composition however; most believed it was a nice way to connect back to the beginning of the video and nice way to finish it. The video was said also to move along smoothly and easy to watch
However we did find some weaknesses in our video, which was received by some constructive criticism when our audience watched the video. The point at which we film at night where the performance is around the tree, it is apparent that it’s hard to make out and see what is going on. As the lighting from the performance and outside was very bright at the beginning of the video it’s a big contrast. This is disappointing, as we couldn’t make out when were shooting the amount we could see, and if we had prepared well we could have brought more red heads, however this would lesion the visual element of the lanterns. Some of the audience believe that there is too much going on in the video and its hard to make our what’s going on till the end, however some people believe this gives the video a sense of suspense and desire to carry on watching. The focus group pointed out that the instrument playing was artificial and lacked realism which was especially seen in Jim who was playing the drums. This is unfortunate as affected the effect of them playing their own instruments. They really enjoyed the cycling shots outside however they believe we should have had more of it, as it added charisma and flare to the video. They thought we should have balanced the shots more and had less of the studio and more of the cycling and performance under the tree.
The encoding-decoding model derives from the work of Stuart Hall at the BCCCS in Birmingham in the 1970’s. It’s more of a theoretical model, which is based upon the notion that the audience do not act as a ‘mass,’ but rather as a collection of smaller groups defined by social and ideological elements. The model believes the media texts are ‘encoded’ with the values of their producers. This is done both consciously and unconsciously. The producers are men and are of a middle class background, which is a very stereotypical view. However, the audience is not made up exclusively of those groups so are likely to ‘read’ the text indifferent ways. This means they have no guarantee that this audience will decode it in the way the producers intended them to. The decoding process had 3 possible outcomes, a preferred reading, a negotiated reading and an oppositional reading.
A preferred reading is when the audience decodes the video in the same way in which the producers encode the video. The usually share the same values and morals and decode what they are intended too. By our selective screenings and focus groups we got several preferred readings. We received positive readings and the audience understood the narrative. They saw it was the journey to a festival, which could also be seen as the journey of maturity. They grasped the fact that the girls and boys are linked and that that girls were linked to powering the band which can also be seen as the audience powering the band and keeping them going. They were able to distinguish the manner of the band through their style, performance and originality and were able to see that they were quickly individuals who are displaying themselves just how they are normally. They also were able to see the link between the bicycles and the environmentally friendly aspect of the video, however they had to be promoted to see this.
A negotiated reading is when the audience shares some elements with the producer but other elements they interrupt are not intended too from the producer. From feedback we saw that instead of the girls in the studio powering the band and performance they were seen as ‘prop’s and ‘decoration,’ instead of the inner meaning of them. A few people were curious to where to they were cycling in the middle of the video, however they realised sooner enough that it was too the festival. They believed the studio performance was very cramped and claustrophobic which contrasted with the idea of the outside and festival element. This is not what we intended, however works very well. This can be seen from the medium shot to the wide shot establishing the scale as well as connecting the natural world into the video. Some audiences believed that at the beginning the band is practicing and rehearsing for the festival at the end, and it’s a build up to the big performance. When we show shots of the setting up of the outside performance, it can be interpreted differently to what they’re setting up, as some people believe that it looks like they’re fixing the bikes. The audience believes there are a few hidden messages and meanings behind the video. Some said the cycling represented the love between the boys and girls, the circle of life, happiness, love, to enjoy life and enjoy your adolescence.
An oppositional reading is when the audience reads the video in the opposite way that the producer intends them too. Some saw the girls in a different way that we did not intended them too. They can be seen as slaves to the boys and just there to look attractive. They can also be seen as decorations and not represented as an active part of the video, which they are. To add to this, the imagery always shows the boys in front of the girls and the girls facing into the boys, which can be seen as sexist and that, the boys are ‘higher’ in the hierarchy than girls. The build up of the performance outside also can be seen as a ‘suicide,’ which was pointed out by one of the participants in our focus group through the hanging of the ropes for the lanterns and the ladder. People can also see the band as ‘wannabe’ with their outfits and costumes that try to be something they’re not and following what is known now as ‘cool’ and ‘trendy.’ This can be seen in their style, outsides and performance, however this is not the case.
In conclusion to this we can see from our positive feedback we were successful with out product. There are some weaknesses and oppositional readings, however this was bound to happen. All in all I’m very happy with our audience feedback and believe that our videos concept was a good choice and that the narrative, image and band was represented well and if you were to look deeper into the narrative, you could find more inner meaning to it. Whatever way you look at the video, it is seen that you can pick up several different ideas and images, which wasn’t intended for, however it tends to work well with the video and all in all represents a clear and fine product.